Jason Williams v AT&T


**Mr. Williams alleges that the hackers gained access to his mobile account, and used it to steal Mr. William's money, and his family’s personal and private information, threaten his family to gain access to his personal and digital finance accounts, steal his cryptocurrency and destroy his business. **

Mr. Williams alleges that this resulted in the loss of a $2 million investment and that after his personal information was compromised, he also had to halt his lucrative cryptocurrency mining operations to stop the hackers from stealing more.

02/10/2022 Update Certificate of Service filed by AT&T Mobility.

02/09/2022 Update  MOTION for Order of Civil Contempt Against Non-Parties Anexio Data Centers and Anexio Managed Services will reset on  2/17/2022 at 03:00 PM.

02/08/2022 Update AT&T’s motion for attorney’s fees is granted. The Anexio Entities must remit $4,007.50 to AT&T’s counsel within 14 days from the entry of the order.  

02/01/2022 Update A hearing on the motion for an order of civil contempt will be held on Wednesday, February 16, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The defendant shall provide notice of this hearing to representatives of Anexo, Anexo Data Centers, and Anexio Managed Service.

01/27/2022 Update Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC (“AT&T”) respectfully notifies the Court that, relative to its Motion for Order of Civil Contempt Against Non-Parties Anexio Data Centers, LLC and Anexio Managed Services after multiple attempts to receive information and a deposition date from non-parties Anexio Data Centers, LLC and Anexio Managed Services its subpoenas, remain unsatisfied, and Anexo continues to be in violation of this Court’s October 12, 2021, WHEREFORE, AT&T respectfully requests a hearing on its Motion.

12/21/2021 Update the court modifies the scheduling order as follows: 

  1. Discovery shall be initiated by time to be completed by February 28, 2022.
  2. All motions except relating to the admissibility of evidence on trial must be filed on or before March 30, 2022.

12/20/2021 Update Parties present via video. Parties update the court as to the status of this **case. **

12/15/2021 Update MOTION for Order of Civil Contempt Against Non-Parties Anexio Data Centers, LLC and Anexio Managed Services, Memorandum in Support regarding MOTION for Order of Civil Contempt Against Non-Parties Anexio Data Centers, LLC, and Anexio Managed Services.

12/13/2021 Update Case managers will provide video conference information signed by magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers. *ORDER Appointing Mediator. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Copy sent via US Mail to Robert A. Beason 

12/10/2021 Update The court notes that AT&T said the Axios Entities have not complied with the court's October 12, 2021, Subpoena-Related Order. Certificate of Service filed by AT&T Mobility, LLC.

12/09/ 2021 Update STATUS REPORT Regarding Discovery (Joint Filing) by AT&T Mobility, LLC 

12/06/2021 Update Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Nancy L. Stagg on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC

12/04/2021 Update The court orders before DECEMBER 10 must serve a COA on the Anexio Entities.

11/15/2021 Update Document: Return Receipt regarding orders received by Anexio, Inc., Registered Agent, Paracorp Incorporated, 

11/04/2021 Update Motion Referred to Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court regarding MOTION for Bill of Costs Motions No Longer Referred to Clerk MOTION for Bill of Costs Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding MOTION for Bill of Costs.

10/20/2021 Update Document: Return Receipt regarding Order received by Anexio Data Centers, LLC Registered Agent Paracord. Incorporated 

10/19/2021 Update MOTION for Bill of Costs (Statement of Fees and Costs) filed by AT&T Mobility, LLC.

10/18/2021 Update STATUS REPORT by both parties regarding their discovery efforts by Jason Williams

10/14/2021 Update Notice of Special Appearance for non-district by Martin Jauerbach on behalf of Jason Williams.

10/12/2021 Update ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion for Order of Contempt to Enforce Subpoenas on Non-Party Anexio Entities.

10/01/2021 Update Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II regarding MOTION for Order of Contempt and Enforce Subpoenas on Non-Party Anexio Entities.

9/17/2021 Update ORDER granting Motion to Enter Agreed Order Regarding Discovery and Case Schedule. Counsel should read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information.

8/18/2021 Update Affidavit of Service for Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition filed by AT&T Mobility, LLC served on Mexico.

8/7/21 Update The Plaintiff's Counsel has served a subpoena to testify for Anexio Managed Services, LLC, a data center used by the defendant.

7/28/21 Update Defendant AT&T answers to the First Amended Complaint by denying ALL claims by Plaintiff Jason Williams.

3/25/20 Update Judge Terrence W. Boyle denies defendant AT&T's motion to dismiss. The court concludes that plaintiff Jason Williams has standing and alleged plausible claims for relief under all of his causes of action.

12/20/19 Update Defendant AT&T files a motion to discuss the plaintiff's failure to state a claim.

10/25/19 Update Plaintiff Jason Williams filed the corrected complaint.

Status Update as of 10/24/19 Plaintiff Jason Williams filed the original complaint.

Claims in
Jason Williams v AT&T
Negligent Supervision

Negligent supervision is a cause of action in United States tort law which arises where one party ("the entrustor") is held liable for negligence because they negligently provided another party ("the entrustee") with a dangerous instrumentality, and the entrusted party caused injury to a third party with that instrumentality. The cause of action most frequently arises where one person allows another to drive their automobile.


Negligence is defined as a failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act (e.g., a duty to help victims of one's previous conduct). 

Violation of The Federal Communications Act
  1. Under 47 U.S. Code § 201, every telecommunications carrier has a duty to protect the confidentiality of proprietary information of, and relating to, other telecommunication carriers, equipment manufacturers, and customers, including telecommunication carriers reselling telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications carrier.
  2. Under 47 U.S. Code § 222, it shall be the duty of every common carrier engaged in interstate or foreign communication by wire or radio to furnish such communication service upon reasonable request therefor; and, in accordance with the orders of the Commission, in cases where the Commission, after opportunity for hearing, finds such action necessary or desirable in the public interest, to establish physical connections with other carriers, to establish through routes and charges applicable thereto and the divisions of such charges, and to establish and provide facilities and regulations for operating such through routes.
North Carolina’s Anti-Hacking Statute

Under N.C.G.S. § 1-539.2A, any person whose property or person is injured by reason of a violation of G.S. 14-458 may sue for and recover any damages sustained and the costs of the suit. 

Violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act

In 1986, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, was introduced to combat hacking, as an update to the first federal computer fraud statute. It has been updated many times over the years, most notably in 2008, to encompass a broad range of actions well beyond its original purpose. The CFAA forbids the intentional access to a device without permission or in excess of permission, but does not specify what "without authorisation" entails. It has been a weapon perfect for violence to usage against virtually any aspect of electronic operation with harsh punishment schemes and malleable clauses.


See all Cases

 Support us

Let’s make them stop! Make a donation for public service announcements, legal actions, and creating legislation that to make it impractical for the mobile carriers to continue to give your mobile service to criminals.