Mr. Richard Harris claims that a T-Mobile employee knowingly processed a fraudulent SIM swap to an unknown individual who has visited a T-Mobile branch pretending to be him. Mr. Richard has set up a PIN that is only known to him & shall be required when requesting a SIM swap.
Because of T-Mobile's alleged negligence, Mr. Richard Harris lost worth at least $55,000 in BTC from his Coinbase account that the hacker took over after their successful fraudulent SIM swap."
02/10/2022 UPDATE George Brounell requested the Court enter an order for a correction re: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice _of Rose S. McCarty. _
02/08/2022 Update *Geoffrey Brounell, counsel for Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc respectfully moves this Court for the admission pro hac vice of Rose S. McCarty, Esq. *Plaintiff respectfully requests to the Court to deny the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. *AND NOW, this 8th day of February 2022, the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Rose S. McCarty, the court ordered, that the motion is GRANTED, thus Rose S. McCarty is admitted pro hac vice to appear before this Court and participate in this action on behalf of T-Mobile USA, Inc.
**1/31/2022 Update ** Mr. Harris contractually agreed to arbitrate his claims rather than to pursue them in court. Case in pending.
1/21/22 Update RESPONSE in Oppositions re 15 Amended Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by RICHARD HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 #3, Law in Oppositions to Defendant's Motion, #4 Exhibit A to Brief, # 5 B to #6, C to #7 D to #8 E to #9 F to #10 G to #11 H to #12 I to #13 (PETRY KERRY)
01/07/2022 Update The Court ORDERED that Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, Plaintiff and Defendants shall proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the written arbitration agreement; that this action stays pending the outcome of the arbitration.
12/20/2021 Update RICHARD HARRIS filed an amended complaint against dependents.
12/16/2021 Update ORDER denying FOR LEAVE TO FILE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 12/16/21.
12/15/2021 Update RESPONSE to Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by T-MOBILE USA, INC.
12/01/2021 Update MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by RICHARD HARRIS
11/11/2021 Update REPLY to Response to Motion Compel Arbitration filed by T-MOBILE USA, INC.
11/11/2021 Update RESPONSE in Opposition re: MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by RICHARD HARRIS.
10/28/2021 Update MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by T-MOBILE USA, INC.
10/04/2021 Update NOTICE of Appearance by GEOFFREY STUART BROWNELL on behalf of T-MOBILE USA, INC.
09/03/2021 Update Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Richard Harris.
7/19/2021 Update WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RICHARD HARRIS. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
07/06/2021 Update The case against T Mobile was filed to Richard Harris.
Negligence is defined as a failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act (e.g., a duty to help victims of one's previous conduct).
Negligent Hiring, Retention, and Supervision is a legal claim made against an employer where an employer must have known or been on notice that the employee was unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he or she was hired or retained.
Gross negligence is more than simple carelessness or failure to act. It is willful behavior done with extreme disregard for the health and safety of others. It is conduct likely to cause foreseeable harm.
One of the primary barriers to getting information from social media sites is the Stored Communications Act,1 which prevents disclosure of information or e-mail stored by an Internet service provider.
Under Section 5742(a)(3) of the WESCA, “[a] person or entity providing an electronic communication service or remote computing service to the public shall not knowingly divulge a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber to, or customer of, the service.” 18 Pa. C.S. §5742(a)(3).
0. Section 201-2(4) of the UTPCPL defines “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” to include the following conduct: a. representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if they are of another; b. failing to comply with the terms of any written guarantee or warranty given to the buyer at, prior to, or after a contract for the purchase of goods or services is made; and c. engaging in any other fraudulent or deceptive conduct which creates a likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding.1
Michael Pierre claims that Coinbase was grossly negligent of its promise to protect and secure its customers' cryptocurrencies from cyberattacks. Mr. Pierre further claims that Coinbase dropped the ball on a series of anti-cyber attack/anti-hack precautions mandated by federal and state laws, rules, and regulations for cryptocurrency exchanges like Coinbase.
Mr. Etheridge alleges that hackers fraudulently SIM swapped his mobile number and stole 159.8 Ethereum tokens from him.
Mr. Kevin Frye claims that T-Mobile employees allowed hackers to steal his phone number through SIM swap. Mr. Frye lost $87,000 worth of BTC from his Coinbase account apart from the $1,536 was withdrawn from his Wells Fargo account.
The People of the United States alleges James O' Connor between March and May 2019. Defendant did participate in a scheme to use SIM swap to steal approximately $784,000 worth of Cryptocurrency from a Manhattan-based cryptocurrency company.
Plaintiff Boyd Egan used a fake driver's license to steal the identity of his victim and used it to request a SIM Swap in a mobile carrier's retail store. He also used the same fake driver's license to personally withdraw funds from his victims' banks with the help of SMS authentication using the victim's number that he fraudulently SIM swapped.
Donations to StopSIMCrime are used to raise awareness by supporting this website, travel to present at events, help victims recover their money, and stop carriers from giving our service to criminals.
A portion of your donation may be used to provide funding for lawsuits against the carriers and criminals. Because the carriers’ Terms of Service do not allow for legal class actions, each victim must take action individually, which may benefit victim individual. For that reason, we are not able to get tax-exempt status. To be clear, your donation is not tax deductible. However, our intention is that our collective efforts through your support will compel the carriers to fix the problem.