April, 2022
|
StopSIMCrime Summit

Richard Harris v T-Mobile

6/7/2021

Mr. Richard Harris claims that a T-Mobile employee knowingly processed a fraudulent SIM swap to an unknown individual who has visited a T-Mobile branch pretending to be him. Mr. Richard has set up a PIN that is only known to him & shall be required when requesting a SIM swap.

Because of T-Mobile's alleged negligence, Mr. Richard Harris lost worth at least $55,000 in BTC from his Coinbase account that the hacker took over after their successful fraudulent SIM swap."

01/07/2022 Update Amends a MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by T-MOBILE USA INC. 

12/20/2021 Update RICHARD HARRIS filed an amended complaint against dependents.

12/16/2021 Update ORDER denying FOR LEAVE TO FILE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 12/16/21.

12/15/2021 Update RESPONSE to Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by T-MOBILE USA, INC.

12/01/2021 Update MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by RICHARD HARRIS

11/11/2021 Update REPLY to Response to Motion Compel Arbitration filed by T-MOBILE USA, INC.

11/11/2021 Update RESPONSE in Opposition re: MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by RICHARD HARRIS.

10/28/2021 Update MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by T-MOBILE USA, INC.

10/04/2021 Update NOTICE of Appearance by GEOFFREY STUART BROWNELL on behalf of T-MOBILE USA, INC.

09/03/2021 Update Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Richard Harris.

7/19/2021 Update WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RICHARD HARRIS. T-MOBILE USA, INC.

07/06/2021 Update The case against T Mobile was filed to Richard Harris.

Claims in
Richard Harris v T-Mobile
Negligence

Negligence is defined as a failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to act (e.g., a duty to help victims of one's previous conduct). 

Violation of The Federal Communications Act
  1. Under 47 U.S. Code § 201, every telecommunications carrier has a duty to protect the confidentiality of proprietary information of, and relating to, other telecommunication carriers, equipment manufacturers, and customers, including telecommunication carriers reselling telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications carrier.
  2. Under 47 U.S. Code § 222, it shall be the duty of every common carrier engaged in interstate or foreign communication by wire or radio to furnish such communication service upon reasonable request therefor; and, in accordance with the orders of the Commission, in cases where the Commission, after opportunity for hearing, finds such action necessary or desirable in the public interest, to establish physical connections with other carriers, to establish through routes and charges applicable thereto and the divisions of such charges, and to establish and provide facilities and regulations for operating such through routes.
Negligent Hiring, Retention, and Supervision

Negligent Hiring, Retention, and Supervision is a legal claim made against an employer where an employer must have known or been on notice that the employee was unfit or incompetent to perform the work for which he or she was hired or retained.

Gross Negligence

Gross negligence is more than simple carelessness or failure to act. It is willful behavior done with extreme disregard for the health and safety of others. It is conduct likely to cause foreseeable harm.

Violation of the Stored Communications Act

One of the primary barriers to getting information from social media sites is the Stored Communications Act,1 which prevents disclosure of information or e-mail stored by an Internet service provider.

Violation of the Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act

Under Section 5742(a)(3) of the WESCA, “[a] person or entity providing an electronic communication service or remote computing service to the public shall not knowingly divulge a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber to, or customer of, the service.” 18 Pa. C.S. §5742(a)(3).

Violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law

0. Section 201-2(4) of the UTPCPL defines “unfair or deceptive acts or practices” to include the following conduct: a. representing that goods or services are of a particular standard, quality or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if they are of another; b. failing to comply with the terms of any written guarantee or warranty given to the buyer at, prior to, or after a contract for the purchase of goods or services is made; and c. engaging in any other fraudulent or deceptive conduct which creates a likelihood of confusion or of misunderstanding.1

Cases

See all Cases
Prev
|
Next

 Support us

Let’s make them stop! Make a donation for public service announcements, legal actions, and creating legislation that to make it impractical for the mobile carriers to continue to give your mobile service to criminals.